Robert Lee James v. Department of Corrections
This text of 829 F.2d 35 (Robert Lee James v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
829 F.2d 35
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Lee JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-7566
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 30, 1987.
Decided September 2, 1987.
Robert Lee James, appellant pro se.
Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Department of Corrections, C/A No. 86-691-N (E.D.Va., March 27, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
829 F.2d 35, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11729, 1987 WL 44728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-lee-james-v-department-of-corrections-ca4-1987.