Robert Lee Huffman v. Harold Eugene Godwin

Fifth Circuit

Robert Lee Huffman v. Harold Eugene Godwin

417 F.2d 518, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10254

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 29, 1969

Docket27758

StatusPublished

This text of 417 F.2d 518 (Robert Lee Huffman v. Harold Eugene Godwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Lee Huffman v. Harold Eugene Godwin, 417 F.2d 518, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10254 (5th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the *519 merits that this ease is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I [Oct. 7, 1969].

In filing this appeal the appellant sought to reverse the district court’s denial of leave to file a complaint for damages in forma pauperis. Since the filing of this appeal, the court below has reconsidered its action and has allowed the complaint to be filed in forma pauperis, thereby rendering this appeal moot. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the *519 merits that this ease is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I [Oct. 7, 1969].

In filing this appeal the appellant sought to reverse the district court’s denial of leave to file a complaint for damages in forma pauperis. Since the filing of this appeal, the court below has reconsidered its action and has allowed the complaint to be filed in forma pauperis, thereby rendering this appeal moot. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 F.2d 518, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-lee-huffman-v-harold-eugene-godwin-ca5-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack