Robert Lee Hood v. Lynn C. Phillips

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24873, 1995 WL 419191
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 1995·No. 95-6588·Published

Opinion

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee HOOD, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Lynn C. PHILLIPS, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-6588.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

Robert Lee Hood, appellant pro se. Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hood v. Phillips, No. CA-94-430-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Lee Hood v. Lynn C. Phillips, 60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24873, 1995 WL 419191 (4th Cir. 1995).

60 F.3d 822 (Robert Lee Hood v. Lynn C. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.