Robert Lee Crider Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 24, 2019·No. 04-18-00856-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 24, 2019

No. 04-18-00856-CR

Robert Lee CRIDER Jr., Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. B1873 Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER On June 10, 2019, appellant filed a pro se “Motion to Set Aside Void Judgment.” Appellant is represented in this appeal by retained counsel: M. Patrick Maguire, 945 Barnett St., Kerrville, Texas 78028, telephone number: 830-895-2590. As appellant was advised in this court’s June 27, 2019 order, appellant does not have a right to hybrid representation, which means appellant and his attorney are not permitted to present independent points to the court of appeals. See Ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (en banc). Appellant’s pro se motion, therefore, is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on July 24, 2019.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Lee Crider Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Robert Lee Crider Jr. v. State (Robert Lee Crider Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Taylor
36 S.W.3d 883 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)