Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Director, Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Director, Department of Corrections

74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39021, 1996 WL 15455

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 17, 1996

Docket95-7202

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1230 (Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Director, Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Lee Brock, A/K/A Two Souls Walker v. Director, Department of Corrections, 74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39021, 1996 WL 15455 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7202.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: January 17, 1996.

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-433 (E.D.Va. July 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7202.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: January 17, 1996.

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-95-433 (E.D.Va. July 25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1230, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39021, 1996 WL 15455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-lee-brock-aka-two-souls-walker-v-director-d-ca4-1996.