Robert Lee Alexander Leatherwood v. State
This text of Robert Lee Alexander Leatherwood v. State (Robert Lee Alexander Leatherwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-17-00474-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
ROBERT LEE ALEXANDER LEATHERWOOD, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.
ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides Order Per Curiam
Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the
appellate record. Appellant's counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has
been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before January 29, 2018, and
it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which
the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d
313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief is GRANTED.
Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made
available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days
thereafter to file its response, if any.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 10th day of January, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Lee Alexander Leatherwood v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-lee-alexander-leatherwood-v-state-texapp-2018.