Robert L. Sanford, Jr. v. Internal Revenue Service

Fourth Circuit

Robert L. Sanford, Jr. v. Internal Revenue Service

60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24908, 1995 WL 404967

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

Docket95-1728

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 824 (Robert L. Sanford, Jr. v. Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert L. Sanford, Jr. v. Internal Revenue Service, 60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24908, 1995 WL 404967 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 824
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert L. SANFORD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1728.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 10, 1995.

Robert L. Sanford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his "Request for an Order of Compliance" which the district court construed as a request under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sanford v. Internal Revenue Service, Nos. CR-88-44; CA-88-44-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 824
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert L. SANFORD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1728.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 10, 1995.

Robert L. Sanford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing as frivolous his "Request for an Order of Compliance" which the district court construed as a request under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sanford v. Internal Revenue Service, Nos. CR-88-44; CA-88-44-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 824, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24908, 1995 WL 404967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-l-sanford-jr-v-internal-revenue-service-ca4-1995.