Robert L. Kruse v. Robert E. Hampton
513 F.2d 1231, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14440
Opinion
Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, and the contentions of the parties at oral argument, we have determined that appellants have failed to demonstrate error. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court opinion. 394 F.Supp. 764 (S.D.Ala. 1975).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert L. Kruse v. Robert E. Hampton, 513 F.2d 1231, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14440 (5th Cir. 1975).
513 F.2d 1231 (Robert L. Kruse v. Robert E. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gall v. American Heritage Life Ins. Co., Inc.
3 F. Supp. 2d 1344 (S.D. Alabama, 1998)
State Department of Revenue v. Jones Manufacturing Co.
589 So. 2d 206 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Kirkland v. State
529 So. 2d 1036 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
American Federation of Government Employees v. Brown
481 F. Supp. 711 (District of Columbia, 1979)