Robert L. Endres v. Paul K. Delo, Superintendent
This text of 986 F.2d 502 (Robert L. Endres v. Paul K. Delo, Superintendent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
986 F.2d 502
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Robert L. ENDRES, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Paul K. DELO, Superintendent, Defendant Appellee.
No. 92-1138.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: September 17, 1992.
Filed: January 5, 1993.
Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration of plaintiff's claim that he was placed in double jeopardy at the robbery trial (the claim labeled Ground II in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation of July 8, 1991) in light of this court's opinion in McIntyre v. Trickey, 975 F.2d 437 (1992). In all other respects, the decision of the district court is affirmed.
On appeal, the parties have debated whether the robbery trial double jeopardy claim is governed by Harris v. Oklahoma, 433 U.S. 76 (1977), an issue we leave to the district court on remand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
986 F.2d 502, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8829, 1993 WL 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-l-endres-v-paul-k-delo-superintendent-ca8-1993.