Robert L. Davis v. Public Schools of Robeson County Purnell Swett, Superintendent

Fourth Circuit

Robert L. Davis v. Public Schools of Robeson County Purnell Swett, Superintendent

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38825, 1996 WL 23354

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 1996

Docket95-1019

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (Robert L. Davis v. Public Schools of Robeson County Purnell Swett, Superintendent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert L. Davis v. Public Schools of Robeson County Purnell Swett, Superintendent, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38825, 1996 WL 23354 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert L. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF ROBESON COUNTY; Purnell Swett,
Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1019.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Robert L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Norman Thompson, Thompson & Godwin, Dunn, NC, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment in his civil action in which he alleged constitutional violations and employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1981 & Supp.1994) and the district court's order denying Appellant's motion to vacate and for temporary retention of the record. With respect to the order granting summary judgment, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Public Schools of Robeson County, No. CA-94-13-3-14-H1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 1994). We do not consider the district court's order denying the motion to vacate and to retain the record because Appellant has failed to note a timely appeal under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). We also deny Appellant's motion to strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert L. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF ROBESON COUNTY; Purnell Swett,
Superintendent, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1019.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Robert L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Norman Thompson, Thompson & Godwin, Dunn, NC, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment in his civil action in which he alleged constitutional violations and employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1981 & Supp.1994) and the district court's order denying Appellant's motion to vacate and for temporary retention of the record. With respect to the order granting summary judgment, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Public Schools of Robeson County, No. CA-94-13-3-14-H1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 1994). We do not consider the district court's order denying the motion to vacate and to retain the record because Appellant has failed to note a timely appeal under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). We also deny Appellant's motion to strike and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38825, 1996 WL 23354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-l-davis-v-public-schools-of-robeson-county--ca4-1996.