Robert L. Cade v. George S. Carpenter, Judge, Superior Court, Baldwin County, Milledgeville, Georgia

367 F.2d 572
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 20, 1966·No. 23399·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying Appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We need not reach the question of whether the action of the District Judge constituted error. Construed as liberally as the rules permit and require, Appellant’s petition cannot be interpreted as a petition for writ of habeas corpus because it is not directed against the person holding Appellant in custody, but rather against the District Judge. As so construed, Appellant fails to state a ground on which relief can be granted, since the actions of the District Judge are protected by the bar of judicial immunity. Carmack v. Gibson, 5 Cir., 1966, 363 F.2d 862.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert L. Cade v. George S. Carpenter, Judge, Superior Court, Baldwin County, Milledgeville, Georgia, 367 F.2d 572 (5th Cir. 1966).

367 F.2d 572 (Robert L. Cade v. George S. Carpenter, Judge, Superior Court, Baldwin County, Milledgeville, Georgia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conover v. Montemuro
477 F.2d 1073 (Third Circuit, 1972)