Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 3, 2019
Docket07-19-00143-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State (Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00143-CR

ROBERT KITCHENS A/K/A ROBERT BAREFIELD A/K/A ROBERT BARFIELD, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 320th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 75,086-D-CR, Honorable David Gleason, Presiding

June 3, 2019

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.

Appellant, Robert Kitchens a/k/a Robert Barefield a/k/a Robert Barfield, appeals

his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in an amount less than one gram,1

enhanced, and sentence of twelve years’ confinement. The trial court’s certification of

appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea-bargain case with no right of appeal

and that appellant has waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

1 TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(b) (West 2017). However, the judgment indicates that appellant pled guilty to the offense pursuant to an

open plea, not a plea bargain. The record also includes a plea memorandum containing

a “Waiver of Appeal” signed by appellant. Although the waiver states that appellant

agreed to waive his right of appeal “as a part of this plea bargain agreement,” the plea

memorandum indicates that there was “No Plea Agreement.”

Because the certification appears defective, we abate the appeal and remand the

cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall conduct

a hearing to determine whether appellant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived

his right of appeal. See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 621 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

The trial court shall also prepare an amended certification of appellant’s right of appeal

consistent with the record and issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on these

matters. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2005) (requiring an appellate court to determine whether the trial court’s certification

comports to the record). The amended certification and the findings of fact and

conclusions of law shall be included in a clerk’s record to be filed with this court by July

3, 2019.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Monreal v. State
99 S.W.3d 615 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-kitchens-aka-robert-barefield-aka-robert-barfield-v-state-texapp-2019.