Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State
This text of Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State (Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-19-00143-CR
ROBERT KITCHENS A/K/A ROBERT BAREFIELD A/K/A ROBERT BARFIELD, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 320th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 75,086-D-CR, Honorable David Gleason, Presiding
June 3, 2019
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.
Appellant, Robert Kitchens a/k/a Robert Barefield a/k/a Robert Barfield, appeals
his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in an amount less than one gram,1
enhanced, and sentence of twelve years’ confinement. The trial court’s certification of
appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea-bargain case with no right of appeal
and that appellant has waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).
1 TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(b) (West 2017). However, the judgment indicates that appellant pled guilty to the offense pursuant to an
open plea, not a plea bargain. The record also includes a plea memorandum containing
a “Waiver of Appeal” signed by appellant. Although the waiver states that appellant
agreed to waive his right of appeal “as a part of this plea bargain agreement,” the plea
memorandum indicates that there was “No Plea Agreement.”
Because the certification appears defective, we abate the appeal and remand the
cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall conduct
a hearing to determine whether appellant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived
his right of appeal. See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 621 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).
The trial court shall also prepare an amended certification of appellant’s right of appeal
consistent with the record and issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on these
matters. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(f); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2005) (requiring an appellate court to determine whether the trial court’s certification
comports to the record). The amended certification and the findings of fact and
conclusions of law shall be included in a clerk’s record to be filed with this court by July
3, 2019.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Kitchens A/K/A Robert Barefield A/K/A Robert Barfield v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-kitchens-aka-robert-barefield-aka-robert-barfield-v-state-texapp-2019.