ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida

ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 28, 2019

Docket19-0390

StatusPublished

This text of ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY (ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-390 ) SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Respondent. ) )

Opinion filed August 28, 2019.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge.

Michael Krouse of Krouse Law Firm, Lakewood Ranch, for Petitioner.

Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman, LLP, Tallahassee; Jason L. Margolin of Akerman, LLP, Tampa; Jason S. Oletsky of Akerman, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the petition for writ of certiorari challenging the trial court's

subject matter jurisdiction as a petition for writ of prohibition, see Mandico v. Taos

Constr., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850, 853 (Fla. 1992), and deny it accordingly.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI