ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 2019·No. 19-0390·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-390 ) SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Respondent. ) )

Opinion filed August 28, 2019.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge.

Michael Krouse of Krouse Law Firm, Lakewood Ranch, for Petitioner.

Katherine E. Giddings of Akerman, LLP, Tallahassee; Jason L. Margolin of Akerman, LLP, Tampa; Jason S. Oletsky of Akerman, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the petition for writ of certiorari challenging the trial court's

subject matter jurisdiction as a petition for writ of prohibition, see Mandico v. Taos

Constr., Inc., 605 So. 2d 850, 853 (Fla. 1992), and deny it accordingly.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY (ROBERT KIMBALL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUNZ INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc.
605 So. 2d 850 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)