Robert K. Carroll, and Andrew L. Campbell v. Fairfax County Adult Detention Center, M. Wayne Huggins, Sheriff, Defendants

862 F.2d 313, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14886, 1988 WL 119089
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1988
Docket88-7173
StatusUnpublished

This text of 862 F.2d 313 (Robert K. Carroll, and Andrew L. Campbell v. Fairfax County Adult Detention Center, M. Wayne Huggins, Sheriff, Defendants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert K. Carroll, and Andrew L. Campbell v. Fairfax County Adult Detention Center, M. Wayne Huggins, Sheriff, Defendants, 862 F.2d 313, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14886, 1988 WL 119089 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

862 F.2d 313
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert K. CARROLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Andrew L. Campbell, Plaintiff,
v.
FAIRFAX COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, M. Wayne Huggins,
Sheriff, Defendants- Appellees.

No. 88-7173.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 29, 1988.
Decided Nov. 8, 1988.

Robert K. Carroll, appellant pro se.

William David Dolan, III, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, for appellees.

Before SPROUSE and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Robert King Carroll* appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carroll v. Fairfax County Adult Detention Center, C/A No. 68-AM (E.D.Va. June 21, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED.

*

Andrew L. Campbell was also a plaintiff in the action below but did not appeal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 F.2d 313, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14886, 1988 WL 119089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-k-carroll-and-andrew-l-campbell-v-fairfax-county-adult-detention-ca4-1988.