Robert Justus v. J. Doerer, et al.
This text of Robert Justus v. J. Doerer, et al. (Robert Justus v. J. Doerer, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBERT JUSTUS, No. 1:25-cv-00138-JLT-SAB (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 9 v. (ECF No. 16) 10 J. DOERER, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens 14 | v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claim Act 15 | (FTCA). 16 On July 31, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable claims, and 17 | granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff has not filed an 18 | amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so has passed. 19 | Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days 20 | from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a 91 | cognizable claim. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to 27 | dismiss the action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Af 35 Dated: _ September 9, 2025 STANLEY A. BOONE 26 United States Magistrate Judge 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Justus v. J. Doerer, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-justus-v-j-doerer-et-al-caed-2025.