Robert James Gray, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 23, 2015
Docket05-14-00919-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Robert James Gray, Jr. v. State (Robert James Gray, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert James Gray, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 05-14-00919-CR FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 4/23/2015 9:30:23 AM LISA MATZ CLERK

NO. 05-14-00919-CR

FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS IN THE DALLAS, TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS 4/23/2015 9:30:23 AM 5TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT LISA MATZ Clerk DALLAS, TEXAS

ROBERT JAMES GRAY, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPEAL IN CAUSE NUMBER 062757 FROM THE 15TH DISTRICT COURT OF GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS HON. JAMES R. FRY, presiding

STATE’S MOTION TO POSTPONE ORAL ARGUMENT

THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes the State of Texas, by and through her attorney in the

above entitled and numbered cause, and files this Motion for Extension of

Time in which to file the Appellee's Brief, and would show the following:

I.

Page 1 of 4 The appellant was convicted of Murder on July 3, 2014 and the

appellant was sentenced to 90 years in prison with a Deadly Weapon

finding and a finding of “True” on one prior conviction.

The appellant filed his brief on January 5, 2015. The appellant filed

two motions for extension in this case. The State’s brief, after one

extension, was filed on March 2, 2015. The appellant’s reply brief was filed

March 22, 2015.

Oral argument and submission in this case has been scheduled for

May 19, 2015.

II.

The State now makes her first request to postpone oral argument.

III.

The facts relied upon to reasonably explain the need for an extension

of time are as follows:

1. This attorney is the sole attorney responsible for post-

Page 2 of 4 conviction litigation in the Grayson County Criminal District

Attorney’s office. The case was tried by an attorney/attorneys

other that this attorney.

2. This attorney has a pre-paid, non-refundable trip out of the

country scheduled for May 14, 2015 to May 21, 2015.

3. Defense Counsel, John Hunter Smith was contacted and

advised of the State’s scheduling issue, and does not oppose

postponing oral argument.

Wherefore, premises considered, the State requests this motion

postpone oral argument be granted and that the Court reset oral argument

and submission for some time after May 21, 2015.

/s/ _______________ ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE

KARLA BAUGH HACKETT ASST. CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS 200 S. CROCKETT SUITE 100 SHERMAN, TEXAS 75090 903/ 813-4361 903/ 892-9933 (FAX) STATE BAR NO. 01923400

Page 3 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATE'S BRIEF has this day been

delivered to the attorney for the Appellant, in accordance with the laws of

the State of Texas.

SIGNED APRIL 22, 2015.

/s/ _______________ ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE KARLA BAUGH HACKETT ASST. CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS

Page 4 of 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert James Gray, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-james-gray-jr-v-state-texapp-2015.