Robert James Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-10859 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-10859 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE, NURSE ELLIS, Head Nurse,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama USCA11 Case: 24-10859 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10859

D.C. Docket No. 2:20-cv-00851-ECM-JTA ____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, LUCK, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Robert Crenshaw, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s January 11, 2024, final order and judgment. The statutory time limit required him to file a notice of appeal on or before February 12, 2024, the Monday following 30 days from the entry of judgment on January 11, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). However, he did not file the instant notice of appeal until March 12, 2024, and thus, it cannot invoke our jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Jeffries v. United States, 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014); Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017). 1 No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

1 Prior to the instant notice of appeal, Crenshaw filed two timely notices of

appeal, resulting in appeal Nos. 24‑10250 and 24‑10338.