Robert Jackson Thompson v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden

Ninth Circuit

Robert Jackson Thompson v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden

956 F.2d 1168, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9094, 1992 WL 46686

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 1992

Docket91-55525

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 956 F.2d 1168 (Robert Jackson Thompson v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Jackson Thompson v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden, 956 F.2d 1168, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9094, 1992 WL 46686 (9th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

956 F.2d 1168

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Robert Jackson THOMPSON, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Daniel VASQUEZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 91-55525.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 6, 1992.*
Decided March 12, 1992.

Before HUG, D.W. NELSON and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

The district court had jurisdiction to enter a stay of execution on the basis of Thompson's request for appointment of counsel. Brown v. Vasquez, No. 90-56127 (9th Cir. Feb. 19, 1992).

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and 9th Cir.R. 34.4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI