Robert J. Metzler, Inc. v. Wyoming Nat. Bank

Third Circuit

Robert J. Metzler, Inc. v. Wyoming Nat. Bank

278 F. 620, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2858

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 1922

DocketNos. 2816-2819

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 278 F. 620 (Robert J. Metzler, Inc. v. Wyoming Nat. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert J. Metzler, Inc. v. Wyoming Nat. Bank, 278 F. 620, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2858 (3d Cir. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Passing by, but expressing no opinion on the two preliminary questions of, first, the standing of the bidders to take these appeals; and, second, whether they are not estopped by their action in taking advantage of the condition in the order setting the sale aside, namely, the return of the hand money paid, and addressing ourselves to the third question, viz. the setting aside of the sale, we are of opinion that not only was there no abuse of discretion by the court below, but so far as the facts are before us, and as we are enlightened by the views of that court, which are reported in Hungerford v. Owen Magnetic Motor Car Corp., 277 Fed. 244, we are of the opinion its action was entirely proper in setting aside the several sales.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Passing by, but expressing no opinion on the two preliminary questions of, first, the standing of the bidders to take these appeals; and, second, whether they are not estopped by their action in taking advantage of the condition in the order setting the sale aside, namely, the return of the hand money paid, and addressing ourselves to the third question, viz. the setting aside of the sale, we are of opinion that not only was there no abuse of discretion by the court below, but so far as the facts are before us, and as we are enlightened by the views of that court, which are reported in Hungerford v. Owen Magnetic Motor Car Corp., 277 Fed. 244, we are of the opinion its action was entirely proper in setting aside the several sales.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 F. 620, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-j-metzler-inc-v-wyoming-nat-bank-ca3-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack