Robert J. Martin v. Monmouth Park Jockey Club

242 F.2d 344, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 2804
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 4, 1957·No. 12113_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, a jockey, appeals from the judgment of the District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing his complaint against the defendants which sought an injunction and damages by reason of the plaintiff’s having been refused permission by the defendants to ride at their Monmouth Park racetrack in 1956. The facts and the applicable legal principles are adequately set out in the opinion filed by Chief Judge Forman in the district court, 145 F.Supp. 439, and need not be repeated here. It is sufficient to say that we are in full accord with Chief Judge Forman’s conclusions and need add nothing to the reasons given by him in support of them.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert J. Martin v. Monmouth Park Jockey Club, 242 F.2d 344, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 2804 (3d Cir. 1957).

242 F.2d 344 (Robert J. Martin v. Monmouth Park Jockey Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marzocca v. Ferone
461 A.2d 1133 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Lemberos v. Laurel Racecourse, Inc.
489 F. Supp. 1376 (D. Maryland, 1980)
Greenberg v. Hollywood Turf Club
7 Cal. App. 3d 968 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)