Robert J. Martin v. Monmouth Park Jockey Club

242 F.2d 344, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 2804
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 1957
Docket12113_1
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 242 F.2d 344 (Robert J. Martin v. Monmouth Park Jockey Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert J. Martin v. Monmouth Park Jockey Club, 242 F.2d 344, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 2804 (3d Cir. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, a jockey, appeals from the judgment of the District Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing his complaint against the defendants which sought an injunction and damages by reason of the plaintiff’s having been refused permission by the defendants to ride at their Monmouth Park racetrack in 1956. The facts and the applicable legal principles are adequately set out in the opinion filed by Chief Judge Forman in the district court, 145 F.Supp. 439, and need not be repeated here. It is sufficient to say that we are in full accord with Chief Judge Forman’s conclusions and need add nothing to the reasons given by him in support of them.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marzocca v. Ferone
461 A.2d 1133 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Lemberos v. Laurel Racecourse, Inc.
489 F. Supp. 1376 (D. Maryland, 1980)
Greenberg v. Hollywood Turf Club
7 Cal. App. 3d 968 (California Court of Appeal, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 F.2d 344, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 2804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-j-martin-v-monmouth-park-jockey-club-ca3-1957.