Robert Howard Green v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 22, 2019·No. 05-18-01068-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 22, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01068-CR No. 05-18-01069-CR

ROBERT HOWARD GREEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F16-76425-T & F16-76426-T

ORDER On May 14, 2019, court reporter Sharina A. Fowler filed a request for a two-week

extension of time to file the reporter’s record so that she might conduct a search for a missing

portion of the record. On May 20, 2019, the Court granted the extension and ordered Ms. Fowler

to file the reporter’s record by May 31, 2019. The Court warned Ms. Fowler that if the record

was not filed by May 31, 2019, the Court would abate these appeals to the trial court to make

findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding why the reporter’s record had not been filed

and whether a portion of the reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed.

To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed, and the Court has had no further

communication from Ms. Fowler regarding the status of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding

whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel,

indigence, because a portion of the record has been lost or destroyed, or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the

appeals. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute

the appeals, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, it shall

next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without

payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed

without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect.

Moreover, if the appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such

measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may

include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not

indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals.

 The trial court shall next determine whether a portion of the reporter’s record has

been lost or destroyed. If the trial court determines that a portion of the

reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed, the trial court shall determine

whether the lost or destroyed portion can be reconstructed and replaced by

agreement of the parties. If the parties cannot agree, the trial court is directed to

determine what constitutes an accurate copy of the lost or destroyed portion of the

reporter’s record and order that the reporter’s record be filed.

 In the event that the trial court determines that a portion of the reporter’s record is

lost and cannot be reconstructed by agreement of the parties or by the trial court

–2– determining what constitutes an accurate copy of the record, the trial court shall

make findings of fact regarding (1) whether appellant timely requested a

reporter’s record; (2) if without appellant’s fault, a significant portion of the

reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed; and (3) whether the lost or destroyed

portion of the reporter’s record is necessary to the appeal’s resolution.

 Finally, the trial court shall determine: (1) the name and address of each court

reporter who recorded the proceedings in these causes; (2) the court reporter’s

explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by

which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact,

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date

of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Lela Lawrence

Mays, Presiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; court reporter Sharina Fowler;

and to counsel for the parties.

We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The

appeals shall be reinstated when the findings are received or at such other time as the Court

deems appropriate.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Howard Green v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Robert Howard Green v. State (Robert Howard Green v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.