Robert H. Kuhn and Gwynne A. Kuhn v. Aero Valley Property Owners Association
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00070-CV ___________________________
ROBERT H. KUHN AND GWYNNE A. KUHN, Appellants
V.
AERO VALLEY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee
On Appeal from the 467th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 21-1576-467
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellants’ brief was due on July 7, 2025. On July 23, 2025, we notified
appellants that their brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless, within ten days, appellants filed with the court an appellants’ brief and an
accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an
extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have
received no response.
Because appellants have failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam
Delivered: August 14, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert H. Kuhn and Gwynne A. Kuhn v. Aero Valley Property Owners Association (Robert H. Kuhn and Gwynne A. Kuhn v. Aero Valley Property Owners Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.