Robert H. Ketchum, Also Known as Jim Ehler v. Denver Police Department, Named As: City and County of Denver Police
This text of 941 F.2d 1213 (Robert H. Ketchum, Also Known as Jim Ehler v. Denver Police Department, Named As: City and County of Denver Police) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
941 F.2d 1213
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
Robert H. KETCHUM, also known as Jim Ehler, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, named as: City and County of
Denver Police, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 91-1203.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 19, 1991.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
Before STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, TACHA and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Robert H. Ketchum appeals from a dismissal of the latest one of his multiple actions claiming that he was falsely arrested for "begging" and "urinating in public," among other things. He asks us not to decide this appeal until his petition for writ of certiorari pending with the Supreme Court with respect to his earlier action is decided.
We AFFIRM the district court's dismissal of this action substantially on the grounds and for the reasons set forth in its order of May 21, 1991. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
941 F.2d 1213, 1991 WL 159853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-h-ketchum-also-known-as-jim-ehler-v-denver--ca10-1991.