Robert H. Dorsey v. The City of Detroit

923 F.2d 854, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20681, 1990 WL 257277
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robert H. Dorsey v. The City of Detroit. Read the opinion of the Court — 858 F.2d 338
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 26, 1990·No. 89-2420·Unpublished

Opinion

923 F.2d 854

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Robert H. DORSEY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF DETROIT, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-2420.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 26, 1990.

Before DAVID A. NELSON and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

On its own motion the court determines that the Notice of Appeal filed herein does not comply with the requirements of Rule 3(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and that this court lacks jurisdiction. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed at the appellant's cost. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co., 487 U.S. 312 (1988); Minority Employees of the Tennessee Dept. of Emp. Sec., Inc. v. State of Tennessee, Dept. of Emp. Sec., 901 F.2d 1327 (6th Cir.1990) (en banc).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert H. Dorsey v. The City of Detroit, 923 F.2d 854, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20681, 1990 WL 257277 (6th Cir. 1990).

923 F.2d 854 (Robert H. Dorsey v. The City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.
487 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1988)