Robert G. Tyson v. Commissioner

9 T.C.M. 162, 1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 266
United States Tax Court·Decided February 28, 1950·No. Docket No. 18445.·Unpublished

Opinion

Robert G. Tyson v. Commissioner.
Robert G. Tyson v. Commissioner
Docket No. 18445.
United States Tax Court
1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 266; 9 T.C.M. (CCH) 162; T.C.M. (RIA) 50060;
February 28, 1950

*266 Under the facts, held:

(1) Upon failure of proof, respondent's determination of the net taxable income of petitioner for the taxable year 1945 is sustained.

(2) Respondent did not err in determining fraud penalties in each of the taxable years 1944 and 1945.

Muckleroy McDonnold, Esq., 1420 Transit Tower, San Antonio, Tex., for the petitioner. D. Louis Bergeron, Esq., for the respondent.

LEECH

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

LEECH, Judge: This proceeding involves deficiencies in Federal income tax and penalties for the calendar years 1944 and 1945, as follows:

Penalties
Sec.Sec.
YearDeficienciesSec. 293(b)Sec. 291(a)294(d)(1)(A)294(d)(2)
1944$ 403.00$ 201.50$ 100.75$ 40.30
19455,679.312,839.651,419.82567.93$340.76

The issues are: (1) whether the respondent erred in determining the net taxable income of petitioner, and (2) whether the penalties for fraud and delinquency should be imposed.

Findings of Fact

Petitioner is a resident of San Antonio, Texas. He did not file any individual income tax return for the taxable years 1944 and 1945.

From 1943 to 1945, inclusive, *267 petitioner and Lonnie H. Rhodes were equal partners in the operation of a travel bureau engaged in transporting soldiers between Hondo and San Antonio, Texas, under the name of BBB Travel Service.

On or about May 5, 1944, petitioner and Rhodes also became partners in the operation of a used car business in San Antonio, Texas, known as San Antonio Auto Exchange and also as San Antonio Automobile Exchange, hereinafter referred to as the partnership.

Several attempts were made by various deputy collectors, during the course of routine investigations of social security and withholding taxes, to have petitioner and Rhodes file individual and partnership returns for the taxable years 1944 and 1945. Some time later, in May or early in June 1946, petitioner and Rhodes engaged a public accountant to prepare such returns. No returns were prepared. About August 5, 1946, the cases of petitioner, Rhodes, and their wives, and the two aforesaid partnerships were assigned to a special agent of the Intelligence Unit of the Bureau of Internal Revenue and an internal revenue agent, for joint investigation. Petitioner and Rhodes were contacted and conferences were held, at which the agents were advised*268 that the books were not available. Some 2,000 canceled checks, check stubs, and monthly bank statements were turned over to the revenue agents by the public accountant.

Since 1939, the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Highway Commission has been required to keep records on all cars bought and sold in the State of Texas. In addition, each purchaser of an automobile has been required to file a purchaser's affidavit within 10 days with the County Tax Assessor, so that the one per cent transfer tax could be collected. During the years here involved, purchasers and sellers of automobiles were required by O.P.A. regulations to submit affidavits as to such purchases and sales.

The customary method used generally and in this case in the purchase of automobiles for resale was to have a finance company "floor plan" the cars purchased. By "floor plan" is meant that the finance company issues its draft on a bank for part or all of the purchase price secured by the dealer's inventory when a dealer buys a car. When the dealer sells the car, the balance of the consideration over and above the cash paid by the purchaser is financed by the finance company for the purchaser of the car. When the*269 purchaser completed his payments to the finance company, the latter, except the San Antonio Mortgage Company, paid to the dealer, the partnership, so-called bonuses, commissions or kickbacks. In all instances above referred to, whether the O.P.A., state, county, or finance companies, the records disclosed the name and address of the purchaser or seller of the used car, as well as the name, year, type, motor number and consideration involved.

No records being available as to purchases and sales of used cars by the partnership, it was necessary for the revenue agents to contact all the above governmental agencies and finance companies. After a careful check and recheck of all such records, the respondent determined the known purchases and sales of used cars for the taxable years to be as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert G. Tyson v. Commissioner, 9 T.C.M. 162, 1950 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 266 (tax 1950).

9 T.C.M. 162 (Robert G. Tyson v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Home Guaranty Abstract Co. v. Commissioner
8 T.C. 617 (U.S. Tax Court, 1947)
Cesanelli v. Commissioner
8 T.C. 776 (U.S. Tax Court, 1947)
Estate of Nitto v. Commissioner
13 T.C. 858 (U.S. Tax Court, 1949)