Robert G. Flores v. the State of Texas
This text of Robert G. Flores v. the State of Texas (Robert G. Flores v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00203-CR
Robert G. FLORES, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020CR4663 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 5, 2024
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On November 9, 2021, appellant pled nolo contendere to possession of a firearm by a felon
and was placed on community supervision for three years. On February 1, 2024, the trial court
revoked appellant’s community supervision and sentenced him to three years in prison. Because
appellant did not file a motion for new trial, his notice of appeal was due by March 4, 2024. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); R. 4.1(a). A motion for extension of time to file appellant’s notice of
appeal was due by March 19, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. However, appellant did not file his 04-24-00203-CR
notice of appeal until March 21, 2024. Furthermore, appellant did not file a motion for extension
of time to file his notice of appeal.
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo
v. State, 918 S.W.3d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered
timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last
day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within
fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals
grants the motion for extension of time. Id.
On April 3, 2024, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by May 3, 2024 why this
appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not file a response to our
order. Because appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal and did not timely file a motion
for extension of time to file his notice of appeal, we have no choice but to dismiss this appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. See id.; Perkins v. State, No. 04-22-00398-CR, 2022 WL 3372418, at *1 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio Aug. 17, 2022, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal
when appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal and failed to file a motion for extension of time
to file a notice of appeal).
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert G. Flores v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-g-flores-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.