Robert G. Basurto v. H. v. Field
This text of 386 F.2d 995 (Robert G. Basurto v. H. v. Field) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
386 F.2d 995
Robert G. BASURTO, Appellant,
v.
H. V. FIELD, Appellee.
No. 21760.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1967.
Robert G. Basurto, in pro. per.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jack K. Weber, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM,1 District judge.
PER CURIAM:
Reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing as to whether appellant was coerced in his guilty plea.
Hon. Robert F. Peckham, United States District Judge, San Francisco, California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 F.2d 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-g-basurto-v-h-v-field-ca9-1967.