Robert G. Basurto v. H. v. Field

386 F.2d 995

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 21, 1967·No. 21760·Published

Opinion

386 F.2d 995

Robert G. BASURTO, Appellant,
v.
H. V. FIELD, Appellee.

No. 21760.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1967.

Robert G. Basurto, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jack K. Weber, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM,1 District judge.

PER CURIAM:

Reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing as to whether appellant was coerced in his guilty plea.

1

Hon. Robert F. Peckham, United States District Judge, San Francisco, California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

386 F.2d 995

Robert G. BASURTO, Appellant,
v.
H. V. FIELD, Appellee.

No. 21760.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1967.

Robert G. Basurto, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jack K. Weber, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and PECKHAM,1 District judge.

PER CURIAM:

Reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing as to whether appellant was coerced in his guilty plea.

1

Hon. Robert F. Peckham, United States District Judge, San Francisco, California, sitting by designation

Robert G. Basurto v. H. v. Field, 386 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

386 F.2d 995 (Robert G. Basurto v. H. v. Field) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.