Robert Francis Ritz v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robert Francis Ritz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 11994
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 24, 2015·No. 03-14-00403-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 24, 2015

NO. 03-14-00403-CR

Robert Francis Ritz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Francis Ritz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Robert Francis Ritz v. State (Robert Francis Ritz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.