Robert F. Meekins, Jr. v. Roy Wisnoski and Mari Kay Wisnoski
Opinion
May 16, 2013
JUDGMENT
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ROBERT F. MEEKINS, Appellant
NO. 14-12-00048-CV V.
ROY WISNOSKI AND MARI KAY WISNOSKI, Appellees
This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Roy Wisnoski and Mari Kay Wisnoski, signed November 11, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred in ordering Meekins to take nothing by his claims and awarding attorney’s fees to the Wisnoskis. We therefore order that the portions of the judgment ordering Meekins to take nothing by his claims and awarding attorney’s fees to the Wisnoskis are REVERSED. We further order the portion of Meekins’s trespass to try title action addressing Meekins’s alleged title to 50% of the mineral estate of the subject real property that Meekins purportedly inherited from Elloise Cox is severed and REMANDED for proceedings in accordance with this court's opinion.
Further, we find no error in the remainder of the judgment and order it AFFIRMED.
We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert F. Meekins, Jr. v. Roy Wisnoski and Mari Kay Wisnoski (Robert F. Meekins, Jr. v. Roy Wisnoski and Mari Kay Wisnoski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.