Robert F. Clayton v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 4, 2015·No. 12-14-00018-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED

12-14-00018-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

8/4/2015 3:37:07 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

P H I L I P C. F L E T C H E R A T T O R N E Y AT LAW 8 0 0 N O R T H M A E - L A R D P A L E S T I N E , T E X A S 7 5 8 0 1 T E L E P H O N E ( 9 0 3 ) 7 3 1 ^ 4 4 4 0 FILED IN F A C S I M I L E ( 9 0 3 > 7 3 1 - 4 4 7 4 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS

August 4, 2 0 1 5 8/4/2015 3:37:07 PM CATHY S. LUSK

Clerk

Mrs. Cathy Lusk Twelfth Court of Appeals 1517 W e s t Front Street, Suite 354 Tyler, T e x a s 75702

Re; R o b e r t C l a y t o n v. T h e S t a t e o f T e x a s , A p p e a l No. 12-14-00018-CR

Dear Mrs. Lusk:

In a c c o r d a n c e w i t h R u l e 4 8 . 4 , 1 certify t h a t o n A u g u s t 4 , 2 0 1 5 , 1 s e n t a c o p y of this Court's Opinion t o Robert C l a y t o n a t his last k n o w n address. T h a t letter a l s o advised Robert Clayton of his rightto pursue a Petition for Discretionary R e v i e w according to T e x a s R u i e o f Appellate P r o c e d u r e 68. T h e letter a n d opinion w e r e mailed using certified mail, return receipt requested.

If y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s , p l e a s e f e e ! f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e .

Sincerely,

P h i l i p C. F l e t c h e r PCF:jsh Enclosure

P H I L I P C. F L E T C H E R ATTORNEY AT LAW

8 0 0 N O R T H M A U - A R D P A L E S T I N E , T E X A S 7 5 8 0 1 T E L E P H O N E ( 9 0 3 ) 7 3 1 - 4 4 4 0 F A C S I M I L E ( 9 0 3 ) 7 3 1 ^ 7 4

August 4, 2015

CMRRR NO. 7002 2410 0004 1477 6793 Mr. R o b e r t C l a y t o n T D C J No. 1903873 B r a d s h a w S t a t e Jail P. O. B o x 9 0 0 0 Henderson, Texas 75653 Re: R o b e r t C l a y t o n v. T h e S t a t e o f T e x a s Appeal Number: 12-14-00018-CR Trial Number: 31223 Dear. Mr. Clayton:

I r e c e i v e d t h e o p i n i o n f r o m t h e T w e l f t h C o u r t o f A p p e a l s . E n c l o s e d is a c o p y o f t h a t o p i n i o n f r o m t h a t court. T h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s ruled a g a i n s t y o u in t h a t t h e y f o u n d t h a t t h e c o u r t d i d n o t e x e r t u n d u e i n f l u e n c e o n t h e h o l d o u t j u r o r i n m a k i n g t h e s t a t e m e n t it d i d .

T h e n e x t level t o y o u r a p p e a l w o u l d b e t o t h e C o u r t o f C r i m i n a l A p p e a l s in A u s t i n , T e x a s . T h e C o u r t o f Criminal A p p e a l s is n o t required t o h e a r appeals, unlike t h e T w e l f t h C o u r t o f A p p e a l s . T h e C o u r t o f C r i m i n a l A p p e a l s h a s d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w a u t h o r i t y in criminal cases. S h o u l d y o u decide t o proceed t o t h e n e x t level of appeal in y o u r case, therefore, y o u w o u l d n e e d t o file a Petition for Discretionary R e v i e w ( P D R ) within thirty days of the date of the opinion of the Twelfth Court of Appeals pursuant to T e x a s Rule of Appellate P r o c e d u r e 68. T h e date of t h e opinion w a s July 15, 2 0 1 5 , s o a P D R w o u l d be d u e t o b e filed with t h e T w e l f t h Court of A p p e a l s n o later t h a n thirty (30) d a y s f r o m this date. T h e Twelfth Court of Appeals would fonward any P D R to the Court of Criminal A p p e a l s . T h e a d d r e s s t o t h e T w e l f t h C o u r t o f A p p e a l s is 1 5 1 7 W e s t F r o n t S t r e e t , S u i t e 3 5 4 , T y l e r , T e x a s 7 5 7 0 2 . 1 d o n o t f e e l t h a t g r o u n d s exist justifying t h e filing o f a P D R in your case, because of the reasons w e have discussed, and while I disagree with the C o u r t ' s ruling, t h e y c o n s i d e r e d t h e e v i d e n c e in a t h o r o u g h m a n n e r in r e a c h i n g their d e c i s i o n . S h o u l d y o u f e e l o t h e n w i s e , it w o u l d b e u p t o y o u t o d r a f t a n d f i l e t h e P D R i n a timely manner.

If y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s , p l e a s e d o n o t h e s i t a t e t o c o n t a c t m y o f f i c e .

Sincerely,

Philip C. F l e t c h e r PCF.jsh Enclosure

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert F. Clayton v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Robert F. Clayton v. State (Robert F. Clayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.