Robert F Broz v. Plante & Moran Pllc
This text of Robert F Broz v. Plante & Moran Pllc (Robert F Broz v. Plante & Moran Pllc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 4, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160988 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra ROBERT F. BROZ and KIMBERLY BROZ, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiffs-Appellants, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 160988 COA: 340381 Otsego CC: 12-014346-NM PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. November 4, 2020 t1028 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert F Broz v. Plante & Moran Pllc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-f-broz-v-plante-moran-pllc-mich-2020.