Robert Eugene Johnson v. T. Bair, Warden Attorney General of the State of Virginia

829 F.2d 35, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11656, 1987 WL 44675
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 1987
Docket86-7318
StatusUnpublished

This text of 829 F.2d 35 (Robert Eugene Johnson v. T. Bair, Warden Attorney General of the State of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Eugene Johnson v. T. Bair, Warden Attorney General of the State of Virginia, 829 F.2d 35, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11656, 1987 WL 44675 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

829 F.2d 35
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Eugene JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
T. BAIR, Warden; Attorney General of the State of Virginia,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 86-7318

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 29, 1987.
Decided September 1, 1987.

Robert Eugene Johnson, appellant pro se.

Jacqueline G. Epps, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Bair, C/A No. 86-0188-R (E.D. Va., Sept. 29, 1986).

DISMISSED.1

1

The appellant's 'Motion to Accept Supplemental Affidavit' is granted and the Affidavit was considered in our decision of this case

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hein v. Monsanto Co
829 F.2d 35 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 F.2d 35, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11656, 1987 WL 44675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-eugene-johnson-v-t-bair-warden-attorney-gen-ca4-1987.