Robert Earl Byrd v. State
This text of Robert Earl Byrd v. State (Robert Earl Byrd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Robert Earl Byrd v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-20-00108-CR
Trial court case number: 1578701
Trial court: 178th District Court of Harris County
Appellant and the State have filed a joint motion to abate the appeal to allow the trial court to issue findings and fact and conclusions of law on appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. We grant the motion and abate the appeal and remand for the trial court to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations in this case, in conjunction with the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding that trial court must provide findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide appellate court with basis to review trial court’s application of law to facts, either in writing or on record at hearing); Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4. The trial court shall make the appropriate findings and conclusions and shall cause them to be filed with the trial court clerk within 30 days of the date of this order. We further order the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket without further order of the Court when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this Court. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Sherry Radack_______ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: ___April 7, 2020____
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Earl Byrd v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-earl-byrd-v-state-texapp-2020.