Robert E. Weiford v. Louis R. Thiebaud

Fourth Circuit

Robert E. Weiford v. Louis R. Thiebaud

422 F.2d 400, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10363

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1970

Docket13678

StatusPublished

This text of 422 F.2d 400 (Robert E. Weiford v. Louis R. Thiebaud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert E. Weiford v. Louis R. Thiebaud, 422 F.2d 400, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10363 (4th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

While stopped for traffic, Robert E. Weiford’s automobile was struck in the rear by a car driven by Louis R. Thiebaud. From a judgment entered on the jury’s verdict for Thiebaud, Weiford appeals claiming Thiebaud was negligent as a matter of law.

We conclude, however, that the question of Thiebaud’s negligence was properly submitted to the jury and that its verdict is supported by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

While stopped for traffic, Robert E. Weiford’s automobile was struck in the rear by a car driven by Louis R. Thiebaud. From a judgment entered on the jury’s verdict for Thiebaud, Weiford appeals claiming Thiebaud was negligent as a matter of law.

We conclude, however, that the question of Thiebaud’s negligence was properly submitted to the jury and that its verdict is supported by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

422 F.2d 400, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-e-weiford-v-louis-r-thiebaud-ca4-1970.