Robert E. Rushton v. Eli Lilly & Company Lilly Retirement Plan

865 F.2d 260, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17718, 1988 WL 138772
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 29, 1988·No. 88-1168·Unpublished

Opinion

865 F.2d 260

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Robert E. RUSHTON, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
ELI LILLY & COMPANY; Lilly Retirement Plan, Defendant-Appellee

No. 88-1168.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 29, 1988.

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert E. Rushton v. Eli Lilly & Company Lilly Retirement Plan, 865 F.2d 260, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17718, 1988 WL 138772 (6th Cir. 1988).

865 F.2d 260 (Robert E. Rushton v. Eli Lilly & Company Lilly Retirement Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related