Robert E. Lee Gresham, Sr. v. United States

329 F.2d 779, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5827
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided April 6, 1964·No. 7562·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, found guilty by a jury, and sentenced for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115. In his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 he asserts deprivation of constitutional rights because of the insufficiency of the indictment. An examination of the indictment establishes that it satisfies the principles summarized in Clay v. United *780 States, 10 Cir., 326 F.2d 196, 198. The motion raised only a question of law and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to appoint counsel or grant a hearing.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert E. Lee Gresham, Sr. v. United States, 329 F.2d 779, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5827 (10th Cir. 1964).

329 F.2d 779 (Robert E. Lee Gresham, Sr. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clone S. Clay v. United States
326 F.2d 196 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)