Robert E. Lee Gresham, Sr. v. United States

329 F.2d 779, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5827
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 1964
Docket7562
StatusPublished

This text of 329 F.2d 779 (Robert E. Lee Gresham, Sr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert E. Lee Gresham, Sr. v. United States, 329 F.2d 779, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5827 (10th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was indicted, found guilty by a jury, and sentenced for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115. In his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 he asserts deprivation of constitutional rights because of the insufficiency of the indictment. An examination of the indictment establishes that it satisfies the principles summarized in Clay v. United *780 States, 10 Cir., 326 F.2d 196, 198. The motion raised only a question of law and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to appoint counsel or grant a hearing.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clone S. Clay v. United States
326 F.2d 196 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 F.2d 779, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-e-lee-gresham-sr-v-united-states-ca10-1964.