Robert E. Fratcher v. State of Florida

191 So. 3d 953, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7197, 2016 WL 2745048
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 11, 2016
Docket4D15-3980
StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 3d 953 (Robert E. Fratcher v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert E. Fratcher v. State of Florida, 191 So. 3d 953, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7197, 2016 WL 2745048 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant’s conviction for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery, which did not. specify whether the dwelling was occupied, does not qualify for prison releasee reoffender (PRR) sentencing. Plain v. State, 141 So.3d 696, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Suffield v. State, 132 So.3d 333, 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Tumblin v. State, 965 So.2d 354, 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also Ellis v. State, 135 So.3d 478, 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Santiago v. State, 76 So.3d 1027, 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Appellant committed' the burglary offense on December 7, 2000. At the time, the PRR statute did not apply to burglary of an unoccupied dwelling. State v. Huggins, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla.2001). After July 1, 2001, the PRR statute was amended so that burglary of a dwelling (whether occupied or unoccupied) qualifies for PRR sentencing. Shiflet v. State, 50 So.3d 1153 *954 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Ch. 2001-239, § 1, Laws of Fla. A conviction for burglary with an assault or battery does not necessarily require the level of force or violence required to meet the catchall provision of section 775.082(9)(a)1.o, Florida Statutes (2000). Tumblin, 965 So.2d at 356 (applying State v. Hearns, 961 So.2d 211 (Fla. 2007)).

Appellant’s mandatory minimum sentence of life in prison as a PRR is therefore illegal. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter for resentencing. Wé reject without discussion any other arguments raised by appellant in his motion.

Reversed and Remanded.

TAYLOR, LEVINE and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tumblin v. State
965 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
State v. Hearns
961 So. 2d 211 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
State v. Huggins
802 So. 2d 276 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Santiago v. State
76 So. 3d 1027 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Shiflet v. State
50 So. 3d 1153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Suffield v. State
132 So. 3d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Ellis v. State
135 So. 3d 478 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Plain v. State
141 So. 3d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 3d 953, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7197, 2016 WL 2745048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-e-fratcher-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.