Robert E. Clune v. Publishers' Association of New York City
This text of 314 F.2d 343 (Robert E. Clune v. Publishers' Association of New York City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
314 F.2d 343
Robert E. CLUNE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PUBLISHERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 309, Docket 28085.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 5, 1963.
Decided March 6, 1963.
John R. Harold, of Harold, Luca, Persky & Mozer, New York City, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
John R. Schoemer, Jr., of Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City (Philip D. Pakula and Lorentz W. Hansen, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.
Before CLARK and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment for defendants is affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Levet, D.C., 214 F.Supp. 520.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
314 F.2d 343, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5954, 1963 Trade Cas. (CCH) 70,694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-e-clune-v-publishers-association-of-new-york-city-ca2-1963.