Robert E. Clune v. Publishers' Association of New York City

314 F.2d 343, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5954, 1963 Trade Cas. (CCH) 70,694
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 6, 1963·No. 28085_1·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

314 F.2d 343

Robert E. CLUNE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PUBLISHERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 309, Docket 28085.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 5, 1963.
Decided March 6, 1963.

John R. Harold, of Harold, Luca, Persky & Mozer, New York City, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

John R. Schoemer, Jr., of Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City (Philip D. Pakula and Lorentz W. Hansen, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before CLARK and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment for defendants is affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Levet, D.C., 214 F.Supp. 520.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert E. Clune v. Publishers' Association of New York City, 314 F.2d 343, 52 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2575, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5954, 1963 Trade Cas. (CCH) 70,694 (2d Cir. 1963).

314 F.2d 343 (Robert E. Clune v. Publishers' Association of New York City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related