Robert Durst and Mika Durst v. Recontrust Company, N.A.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 22, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00279-CV ——————————— ROBERT DURST AND MIKA DURST, Appellants V. RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-65762
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Robert Durst and Mika Durst, have neither established indigence
nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk=s record. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to
dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert Durst and Mika Durst v. Recontrust Company, N.A. (Robert Durst and Mika Durst v. Recontrust Company, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.