Robert Durst and Mika Durst v. Recontrust Company, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 22, 2013·No. 01-13-00279-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 22, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00279-CV ——————————— ROBERT DURST AND MIKA DURST, Appellants V. RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-65762

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Robert Durst and Mika Durst, have neither established indigence

nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk=s record. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to

dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Durst and Mika Durst v. Recontrust Company, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Robert Durst and Mika Durst v. Recontrust Company, N.A. (Robert Durst and Mika Durst v. Recontrust Company, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.