Robert Douglas Turner v. Richard W. Crossen, Jr.

Fourth Circuit

Robert Douglas Turner v. Richard W. Crossen, Jr.

74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39063, 1996 WL 26824

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 24, 1996

Docket95-7239

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1234 (Robert Douglas Turner v. Richard W. Crossen, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Douglas Turner v. Richard W. Crossen, Jr., 74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39063, 1996 WL 26824 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Douglas TURNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Richard W. CROSSEN, Jr., Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-7239.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

Robert Douglas Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

ED.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Crossen, No. CA-95-365 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Douglas TURNER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Richard W. CROSSEN, Jr., Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-7239.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

Robert Douglas Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

ED.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Crossen, No. CA-95-365 (E.D.Va. Aug. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1234, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39063, 1996 WL 26824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-douglas-turner-v-richard-w-crossen-jr-ca4-1996.