Robert Dent v. Colin Ottey

698 F. App'x 99
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 3, 2017
Docket17-6396
StatusUnpublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 698 F. App'x 99 (Robert Dent v. Colin Ottey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Dent v. Colin Ottey, 698 F. App'x 99 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Dent appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in fa *100 vor of Defendant Colin Ottey as to Dent’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claim of deliberate indifference to his medical needs.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Dent v. Ottey, No. 8:15-cv-00206-CCB, 2017 WL 930126 (D. Md. Mar. 9, 2017); see also Harrods Ltd. v. Sixty Internet Domain Names, 302 F.3d 214, 244-45 (4th Cir. 2002) (discussing requirements to preserve claim that summary judgment was granted prematurely). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Floyd v. Talo
D. Maryland, 2023
Floyd v. Clark
D. Maryland, 2023
Jenkins v. Getachew
D. Maryland, 2023
Pollard v. Dorsey
D. Maryland, 2022
Velasquez v. Getachew
D. Maryland, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 F. App'x 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-dent-v-colin-ottey-ca4-2017.