Robert Dean Dailey v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Robert Dean Dailey v. United States

283 F.2d 253

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robert Dean Dailey v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 F.2d 927 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1960·No. 18308_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant and two others were convicted of Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, violations. The sole ground of the appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. The sordid story requires no retelling. The evidence justified the guilty verdict and the judgment thereon. Cf. Flanagan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 277 F.2d 109. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant and two others were convicted of Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, violations. The sole ground of the appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. The sordid story requires no retelling. The evidence justified the guilty verdict and the judgment thereon. Cf. Flanagan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 277 F.2d 109. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Robert Dean Dailey v. United States, 283 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

283 F.2d 253 (Robert Dean Dailey v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related