Robert Dean Dailey v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Robert Dean Dailey v. United States

283 F.2d 253

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 21, 1960

Docket18308_1

StatusPublished

This text of 283 F.2d 253 (Robert Dean Dailey v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Dean Dailey v. United States, 283 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant and two others were convicted of Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, violations. The sole ground of the appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. The sordid story requires no retelling. The evidence justified the guilty verdict and the judgment thereon. Cf. Flanagan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 277 F.2d 109. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant and two others were convicted of Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421, violations. The sole ground of the appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. The sordid story requires no retelling. The evidence justified the guilty verdict and the judgment thereon. Cf. Flanagan v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 277 F.2d 109. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 F.2d 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-dean-dailey-v-united-states-ca5-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack