Robert Darnell Roberts v. Deputy Kluczynski Sheriff Kennedy Cecil County Detention Center Chief Lough Jeffrey Clewer, Director

16 F.3d 411, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7297, 1994 WL 7199
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 1994
Docket93-6994
StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 411 (Robert Darnell Roberts v. Deputy Kluczynski Sheriff Kennedy Cecil County Detention Center Chief Lough Jeffrey Clewer, Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Darnell Roberts v. Deputy Kluczynski Sheriff Kennedy Cecil County Detention Center Chief Lough Jeffrey Clewer, Director, 16 F.3d 411, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7297, 1994 WL 7199 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

16 F.3d 411
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Darnell ROBERTS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Deputy KLUCZYNSKI; Sheriff Kennedy; Cecil County Detention
Center; Chief Lough; Jeffrey Clewer, Director,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-6994.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided: Jan. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-147-S)

Robert Darnell Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.

H. Norman Wilson, Jr., Elkton, Maryland; Daniel Karp, Allen, Johnson, Alexander & Karp, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberts v. Kluczynski, No. CA-93-147-S (D. Md. Sept. 8, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F.3d 411, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7297, 1994 WL 7199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-darnell-roberts-v-deputy-kluczynski-sheriff-ca4-1994.