Robert D. Elbert v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Robert D. Elbert v. United States

243 F.2d 667

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 7, 1957

Docket13618

StatusPublished

This text of 243 F.2d 667 (Robert D. Elbert v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert D. Elbert v. United States, 243 F.2d 667 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asks us to reverse his conviction of robbery. There was ample and substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The charge as given was adapted to the issues and clearly adequate for the guidance of the jury. Moreover, there was no objection by appellant to the charge before the jury retired to consider its verdict, Rule 30, Fed.R.Crim. P., 18 U.S.C.A. There is no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asks us to reverse his conviction of robbery. There was ample and substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The charge as given was adapted to the issues and clearly adequate for the guidance of the jury. Moreover, there was no objection by appellant to the charge before the jury retired to consider its verdict, Rule 30, Fed.R.Crim. P., 18 U.S.C.A. There is no error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 F.2d 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-d-elbert-v-united-states-cadc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack