Robert D. Elbert v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Robert D. Elbert v. United States

243 F.2d 667

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 7, 1957·No. 13618·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asks us to reverse his conviction of robbery. There was ample and substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The charge as given was adapted to the issues and clearly adequate for the guidance of the jury. Moreover, there was no objection by appellant to the charge before the jury retired to consider its verdict, Rule 30, Fed.R.Crim. P., 18 U.S.C.A. There is no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asks us to reverse his conviction of robbery. There was ample and substantial evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The charge as given was adapted to the issues and clearly adequate for the guidance of the jury. Moreover, there was no objection by appellant to the charge before the jury retired to consider its verdict, Rule 30, Fed.R.Crim. P., 18 U.S.C.A. There is no error.

Affirmed.

Robert D. Elbert v. United States, 243 F.2d 667 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Pincite

243 F.2d 667 (Robert D. Elbert v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related