Robert Craft v. State of Florida
Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida THURSDAY, MARCH 4, 2021
CASE NO.: SC19-953 Lower Tribunal No(s).: 122018CF000667CFAXMX
ROBERT CRAFT vs. STATE OF FLORIDA
Appellant(s) Appellee(s)
Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied.
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion.
LABARGA, J., concurring.
I agree that Craft has not established a basis for rehearing, and consequently,
I have voted to deny rehearing. However, I firmly adhere to my dissent in
Lawrence v. State, 308 So. 3d 544 (Fla. 2020), and my belief that proportionality
review is an essential part of this Court’s review of death penalty cases on direct
appeal.
A True Copy Test: CASE NO.: SC19-953 Page Two
so Served:
RICHARD M. BRACEY III HON. JESSICA JOAN YEARY, PUBLIC DEFENDER WILLIAM D. CHAPPELL HON. P. DEWITT CASON, CLERK HON. PAUL SPURGIN BRYAN, JUDGE HON. MARK EDWARD FEAGLE, CHIEF JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robert Craft v. State of Florida (Robert Craft v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.