ROBERT CONSER v. STUDENT TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC, etc.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 24, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
Nos. 3D20-1; 3D20-1063 Lower Tribunal No. 17-25327 ________________
Jetstream International, LLC, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Student Travel Services, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees.
Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge.
Law Offices of Robert P. Frankel, P.A., and Robert P. Frankel (Plantation), for appellants.
Clarke Silverglate, P.A., Spencer H. Silverglate and Shannon P. McKenna, for appellee STS Travel Group, LLC.
Before LOGUE, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Se. Floating Docks, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 82
So. 3d 73, 80 (Fla. 2012) (“An agreement between parties to be bound by
the substantive laws of another jurisdiction is presumptively valid, and this
Court will enforce a choice-of-law provision unless applying the chosen
forum’s law would contravene a strong public policy of this State.”);
Burroughs Corp. v. Suntogs of Miami, Inc., 472 So. 2d 1166, 1169 (Fla.
1985) (concluding the contractual provision applying another state’s law
regarding the limitations period was not contrary to a strong public policy);
see also Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.
1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ROBERT CONSER v. STUDENT TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC, etc. (ROBERT CONSER v. STUDENT TRAVEL SERVICES, LLC, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.