Robert Childress Jr. v. United States Attorney General
This text of Robert Childress Jr. v. United States Attorney General (Robert Childress Jr. v. United States Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No.: 5:24-00492 AH (ADS) Date: February 14, 2025 Title: Ahmad Lewis v. Martin O’Malley
Present: The Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge
Kristee Hopkins None Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (DKT. NO. 21)
Before the Court is the Stipulation for Award and Payment of Attorney Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “Stipulation”). (Dkt. No. 21.) The Stipulation is not supported by sufficient and appropriately authenticated evidence to justify the fee award requested. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B) (requiring an “itemized statement” to show “actual time expended”); Carvajal v. U.S., 521 F.3d 1242, 1249 (9th Cir. 2008) (party seeking EAJA fees must show requested attorney fees are reasonable). Accordingly, the Stipulation is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Clerk kh
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Childress Jr. v. United States Attorney General, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-childress-jr-v-united-states-attorney-general-cacd-2025.