Robert Childress Jr. v. United States Attorney General

District Court, C.D. California·Decided February 14, 2025·No. 5:24-cv-02564·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No.: 5:24-00492 AH (ADS) Date: February 14, 2025 Title: Ahmad Lewis v. Martin O’Malley

Present: The Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge

Kristee Hopkins None Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (DKT. NO. 21)

Before the Court is the Stipulation for Award and Payment of Attorney Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “Stipulation”). (Dkt. No. 21.) The Stipulation is not supported by sufficient and appropriately authenticated evidence to justify the fee award requested. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B) (requiring an “itemized statement” to show “actual time expended”); Carvajal v. U.S., 521 F.3d 1242, 1249 (9th Cir. 2008) (party seeking EAJA fees must show requested attorney fees are reasonable). Accordingly, the Stipulation is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Clerk kh

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Childress Jr. v. United States Attorney General, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Robert Childress Jr. v. United States Attorney General (Robert Childress Jr. v. United States Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carvajal v. United States
521 F.3d 1242 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)