Robert Chapman Co. v. Carhart

162 S.E. 840, 44 Ga. App. 754, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 481
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1932
Docket21596
StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 840 (Robert Chapman Co. v. Carhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Chapman Co. v. Carhart, 162 S.E. 840, 44 Ga. App. 754, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 481 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Bkoyles, C. J.

1. The declaration in attachment as finally amended was not subject to any ground of the demurrer interposed, and the trial judge, properly so ruled.

2. The judgment in favor of the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment refusing to grant the motion.

3. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 840, 44 Ga. App. 754, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-chapman-co-v-carhart-gactapp-1932.