Robert Chambers v. Kenneth Sutton

Fourth Circuit

Robert Chambers v. Kenneth Sutton

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38817, 1996 WL 24741

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 24, 1996

Docket95-7537

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (Robert Chambers v. Kenneth Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Chambers v. Kenneth Sutton, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38817, 1996 WL 24741 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kenneth SUTTON, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7537.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided: Jan. 24, 1996.

Robert Chambers, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Chambers v. Sutton, No. CA-95-486-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kenneth SUTTON, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7537.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided: Jan. 24, 1996.

Robert Chambers, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Chambers v. Sutton, No. CA-95-486-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (West 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38817, 1996 WL 24741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-chambers-v-kenneth-sutton-ca4-1996.