Robert Carey and Linda Carey, Minors, by Their Parents and Natural Guardians, Merle G. Carey and Helen J. Carey, and Merle G. Carey, in His Own Right v. Benjamin Danecki (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Merle G. Carey (Third-Party Defendant)

Third Circuit

Robert Carey and Linda Carey, Minors, by Their Parents and Natural Guardians, Merle G. Carey and Helen J. Carey, and Merle G. Carey, in His Own Right v. Benjamin Danecki (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Merle G. Carey (Third-Party Defendant)

299 F.2d 937, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5765

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1962

Docket13739_1

StatusPublished

This text of 299 F.2d 937 (Robert Carey and Linda Carey, Minors, by Their Parents and Natural Guardians, Merle G. Carey and Helen J. Carey, and Merle G. Carey, in His Own Right v. Benjamin Danecki (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Merle G. Carey (Third-Party Defendant)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Carey and Linda Carey, Minors, by Their Parents and Natural Guardians, Merle G. Carey and Helen J. Carey, and Merle G. Carey, in His Own Right v. Benjamin Danecki (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff) v. Merle G. Carey (Third-Party Defendant), 299 F.2d 937, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5765 (3d Cir. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

299 F.2d 937

Robert CAREY and Linda Carey, Minors, by Their Parents and
Natural Guardians, Merle G. Carey and Helen J.
Carey, and Merle G. Carey, in His Own Right,
v.
Benjamin DANECKI (Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff),
Appellant, v. Merle G. CAREY (Third-Party Defendant).

No. 13739.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 8, 1962.
Decided March 5, 1962.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; John L. Miller, Judge.

James A. McGregor, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Robert E. Wayman, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Dickie, McCamey, Chilcote & Robinson. Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for thirdparty defendant.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record and the briefs in this case and consideration of the oral arguments convinces us that the court below committed no error. Its interpretation of the release is correct. Consequently, judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI